Friends of Central Sands
Your Subtitle text
 
Follow us!  
Donate

Policy Alerts


Get the latest news from across Wisconsin - Stay informed on news that affects you and see how you can make a difference!

>> Take Action
 

Projects


FOCS is active in several projects around the Central Sands region. Click here to read more about how your support makes this possible!

>> Our Work 
 

Get decked out in FOCS gear!


Invitation only special events and great FOCS gear... donate and get yours today!       


  >> Support Us 


Many things are happening.. 
...for timely news and updates please follow us on
Facebook

Read our letter to DNR Secretary Stepp regarding the Attorney General's opinion limiting the DNR's authority in permitting high capacity wells.

 

Wisconsin Public Radio interview regarding our letter to Secretary Stepp


We have a Victory!

Judge Rules DNR Must Consider Cumulative Impacts in Issuing High-Capacity Well Permits


But the DNR is continuing to play a game...

The DNR issued a modified WPDES permit (waste spreading) to the Richfield CAFO without taking into consideration the Judge’s comments in our successful appeal.  You may recall that Judge Boldt’s decision in the WPDES portion of our appeal discussed our request for an Animal Unit cap, i.e. a cap on the number of animal units (cows) Richfield Dairy can put on its property.  This effectively limits the waste the facility can generate.  Judge Boldt agreed a cap was appropriate, and further said: “The Department should establish a sustainable cap on animal units in conjunction with the revised permit reducing the maximum annual pumping in the companion high-capacity well cases.”   Richfield Dairy originally applied for 6,270 Animal Units (AU) or about 4,550 cows and steers.  Well to us this was pretty clear.  Less water = less animals.  After Judge Boldt’s decision came down, Richfield Dairy still asked for 6,270 Animal Units.  Friends of the Central Sand's legal counsel protested to the DNR that this number was too high, given the reduced 52.5 million gallons per year (MGPY) pumping limit, and argued that a cap of 4,279 AU was appropriate based on the dairy’s own documentation.    Well, the DNR has decided to modify the WPDES permit and include a cap of 6,270 AU—just what Richfield Dairy asked for.  The draft permit is here. They did not provide strong justification for their decision, so FOCS legal counsel contacted DNR staff directly.   Our legal counsel was told that the DNR didn’t believe that Judge Boldt actually required the AU number to be tied to the pumping limit.  We obviously disagree.  It’s pretty clear from Judge Boldt’s own words that he intended the AU cap to be tied to the pumping limit, that he wanted DNR to attempt this analysis, and that the expectation was that the AU limit would be lower as a result of the pumping limit.  The DNR couldn’t set a random AU cap and let the Dairy determine how to comply with the pumping limit.

We are pursuing options to ensure that the Judge's order is followed...

 

What is happening to our water?
See these short commercials produced by FOCS

Not Standing Still:  The Degradation of Wisconsin's Water



A short film by FOCS depicting the loss of water in Wisconsin's Central Sands
______________________________________

 

Website Builder